This provides evidence for the MSM: people tend to remember the first items because they have longer to rehearse the information and they may have paid more attention to it, so it has a higher probability of being transferred to the LTS.They tend to remember the most recent information because it is still in their STS.
Information in the middle may be lost because of the limited capacity of the STS. This is when participants are exposed to a list of words (e.g. Using this method, researchers detected a pattern: participants can remember words better when they appear at the beginning of a list and at the end of a list. Glanzer And Cunitz 1966 Serial Position Effect Hypothesis Serial Position EffectThis has been dubbed the serial position effect (aka the primacy and recency effects). Glanzer And Cunitz 1966 Serial Position Effect Hypothesis Series Of ExperimentsIn order to demonstrate this, they conducted a series of experiments involving memory tests. The researchers used a repeated measures design by testing subjects individually and randomly assigning the word lists to one of the three conditions. This provides further support for the MSM as it shows the duration of the STS is limited and that information rehearsed can be transferred to the LTS. Web. ( Link to full study ). However, there are numerous pitfalls that you have to be careful of. If you are thinking of conducting this study for your IA, here are some things to keep in mind. You should therefore focus on the primacy or the recency effect. You will need to operationally define what the primacy or recency is in your experiment. For example, if youre doing recency only, is this the last word in the sequence, the last two words, the last quarter, one third, etc. Sometimes, though, I include the Murdock study to introduce the Serial Position Effect. Themantic Education Ltd., PO Box 20, Rangiora, New Zealand 7440.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |